91快色

Nov. 24, 2025

U91快色 social work PhD grad's collaborative research envisions more inclusive health-care system

Sandy Rao and a team of young co-researchers create new models and approaches to bring unheard voices into health-care research
Sandy rao looks over her shoulder toward the camera
Sandy Rao Courtesy Sandy Rao

When recent graduate Dr. Sandy Rao began her PhD in social work at the 91快色, she brought with her years of experience as both a clinician and a senior leader in Ontario鈥檚 health system. 

Yet, despite her deep understanding of mental health care, she found herself haunted by a question no program or policy seemed to answer: 鈥淲e were doing all the right things: engaging the community, co-designing programs, listening to lived experience, so why wasn鈥檛 it working?鈥

That question became the foundation for her doctoral research: exploring not just mental health access, but how to research access, finding ways of including people who are usually missed in traditional studies.

Before entering academia, Rao, PhD'25, was director of Mental Health and Addictions at . She鈥檇 led the development of a 鈥渓ow-barrier鈥 access model that involved thousands of community engagements and did everything that was usually suggested for removing barriers. The only problem was it didn鈥檛 work.  

鈥淚t was supposed to be the gold standard,鈥 says Rao. 鈥淏ut, when it launched, it failed to meet people鈥檚 needs. That鈥檚 what drove me back to school. I wanted to understand why.鈥

The 鈥渁ccess paradox鈥

Working under the supervision of Dr. Gina Dimitropoulos, PhD, of the and Dr. Scott Patten, PhD'94, MD, of the , Rao鈥檚 research uncovered what she calls the access paradox: the realization that the very things required to access mental health care are often impossible for someone experiencing mental illness.

鈥淚f we were designing a system for someone with a broken leg, we would never put the clinic on the 30th floor with no elevator 鈥 everyone would agree that makes no sense 鈥 yet, that鈥檚 exactly what we do to people with mental illness,鈥 Rao says. 

鈥淲e design systems that require them to fill out dozens of forms, travel to new places, make phone calls and advocate for themselves, all the things they鈥檙e least able to do when they鈥檙e unwell.

鈥淚n effect, the system becomes an exclusionary structure. If you manage to do all those things, people assume you must not be that sick. It鈥檚 a catch-22. That鈥檚 the access paradox.鈥

An image gallery of HEARTS study researchers

Rao's collaborators and co-researchers included young adults with lived experience trying to navigate the health-care system.

The HEARTS Study

Rao鈥檚 doctoral research, the  (Helping Enable Access and Remove Barriers To Support for Youth and Young Adults) brought these insights together. 

Designed and conducted with young people who live with mental health-related disabilities, HEARTS explored what real accessibility means in practice, and how traditional research often excludes the very individuals most affected by inaccessibility.

鈥淭he goal of HEARTS was to make sure that the research process itself didn鈥檛 reproduce the same barriers we were studying,鈥 Rao says. 

鈥淲e co-designed every part of it, from how we gathered data to how we shared findings, so that young people could fully participate, even when traditional methods made that hard.鈥

The study identified the access paradox and led to the creation of Rao's (MAPS Lab), which continues to partner with youth, families and service providers to test new, equity-informed approaches to care. 

鈥淭he MAPS Lab is about moving from theory to action,鈥 she says. 

鈥淲e鈥檙e building evidence with communities, not for them.鈥

A social work lens on health research

For Rao, HEARTS is also a prime example of why social work research is so essential in reimagining systems of care.

鈥淪ocial work starts from values: justice, dignity and liberation,鈥 she says. 

鈥淥ther disciplines try to bracket those things out, but we don鈥檛. The goal of this research was emancipation; to make research itself accessible and liberatory for young people with mental health-related disabilities.鈥

Her approach, rooted in critical realism, challenged the biomedical model鈥檚 reliance on a single 鈥渙bjective鈥 truth. Instead, Rao and her co-researchers embraced multiple ways of knowing, incorporating lenses that included Indigenous and Afrocentric perspectives. 

鈥淭here isn鈥檛 one way to be well,鈥 Rao says. 鈥淎nd there isn鈥檛 one way to create knowledge, either.鈥

These multiple ways of knowing the world are, for example, reflected in her innovative dissertation which included a playlist of songs chosen by participants who struggled to express their experiences in words. 

鈥淢usic became a language for people whose symptoms made it hard to communicate," Rao says. 

"It let them be heard in a way that felt authentic.鈥

Co-creating solutions

Rather than simply identifying what was broken, Rao鈥檚 team co-developed a Recognition-Access Opportunity Map, a tool to help practitioners and systems reduce barriers in real time. Recommendations include offering home-based services, reducing redundant paperwork and adapting physical spaces to minimize sensory overload.

鈥淪omething as simple as dimming lights or changing the environment can make a huge difference,鈥 Rao says. 

鈥淲e can鈥檛 wait for structural reform before we make things more humane.鈥

She also reframes common narratives: 鈥淲e say young people 鈥榝all through the cracks,鈥 but the truth is, the system was never built for them. They鈥檙e not failing, they鈥檙e surviving ableist structures that were designed without them in mind.鈥

Changing the conversation

is already influencing teaching and practice. 

Now an instructor at the University of Toronto, she integrates her findings into her social work courses. 

One small, but powerful shift she promotes is moving from asking clients, 鈥淲hat鈥檚 wrong with you?鈥 to, 鈥淲hat matters to you?鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 a subtle change, but it transforms the encounter,鈥 Rao says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 about dignity, not diagnosis.鈥

Her work has also inspired her young co-researchers to lead their own projects 鈥 several have already published their first papers. 

鈥淭hat鈥檚 what I鈥檓 most proud of,鈥 Rao says. 

鈥淗elping young people find their voice and lead their own research and then stepping out of the way.鈥

What鈥檚 next?

Rao continues to practice as a clinician while leading international collaborations on critical realism. She directs the  and co-leads a global fellowship that includes scholars from India, Iran and across Africa.

Her next goal is clear: to keep turning research into action. 

鈥淩esearch sitting on a shelf helps no one,鈥 Rao says. 

鈥淲e now have an evidentiary start.

"The next step is putting it into practice - creating systems where everyone, regardless of ability, is seen, heard and valued.鈥

The 91快色, Faculty of Social Work is Canada's largest school of social work and recognized as a global leader in social work research. 

Dr. Gina Dimitropoulus, PhD, is a professor in the Faculty of Social Work. She is also a member of the Cumming School of Medicine鈥檚 O鈥橞rien Institute for Public Health, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI) and HBI鈥檚 Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education. She is also a member of the CSM鈥檚 Alberta Children鈥檚 Hospital Research Institute.  

Dr. Scott Patten, MD, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine (CSM). He is a member of the CSM鈥檚 O鈥橞rien Institute for Public Health, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI) and HBI鈥檚 Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education. He is also a member of the CSM鈥檚 Alberta Children鈥檚 Hospital Research Institute.   

 

Sign up for UToday

Sign up for UToday

Delivered to your inbox 鈥 a daily roundup of news and events from across the 91快色's 14 faculties and dozens of units

Thank you for your submission.