91快色

Feb. 18, 2020

U91快色 political scientist examines perceptions of leadership within Canadian political parties

Brenda O鈥橬eill is first winner of Thelma Margaret Horte Memorial Fellowship in Women and Society
Brenda O'Neill

Brenda O'Neill receives inaugural research award in memory of Margaret Horte.

Courtesy Brenda O'Neill

When it comes to the notion of gender equity within the ranks of Canada鈥檚 political leadership it seemed, for a brief moment, as if a semblance of parity had been achieved in the period between February 2013 and April 2014. In that window of time, women made up half of Canada鈥檚 premiers, including leadership in the country鈥檚 most economically powerful provinces, with Christy Clark in British Columbia, Alison Redford in Alberta, Kathleen Wynne in Ontario and Pauline Marois in Quebec.

The moment, however, now seems but a blip. Last April, when Rachel Notley was defeated by Jason Kenney in the Alberta provincial election, Canada鈥檚 roster of premiers was, again, all male, which has largely been the status quo throughout the country鈥檚 history.

Dr. Brenda O鈥橬eill, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Political Science, is looking to find out why that is with her new research project, entitled Perceptions of Political Leadership in Canadian Political Parties. She undertakes this project thanks to the Thelma Margaret Horte Memorial Fellowship in Women and Society, a $10,000 research award that was established in the memory of Horte. The newly inaugurated fellowship will be awarded annually to a faculty member in the Faculty of Arts.

Annual fellowship honours women's rights advocate

Horte was a determined advocate of women鈥檚 rights, committed to advancing the cause of women in society and fighting for equality in the workplace. O鈥橬eill is the first winner of this annual fellowship in Horte鈥檚 name.

鈥淭here鈥檚 been a lot of research on voters and how they assess, evaluate and stereotype party candidates,鈥 says O鈥橬eill. 鈥淏ut we don鈥檛 know much about how this assessment process works within political parties. And this is of crucial importance, because the parties decide who their leaders are going to be.鈥

O鈥橬eill will be examining how leadership is defined and understood within political parties with her focus trained on two groups within the various parties.

鈥淥n one level you have the party membership,鈥 she says. 鈥淔or twenty dollars or so you can be a member of a political party and the vast majority of parties now actually allow members to vote for their leader. It鈥檚 telling, I think, that the party membership which votes during a leadership race is often different than the membership of that party even six months later. People take out memberships just to vote in that race.鈥

Secondly, O鈥橬eill will be putting the microscope on the 鈥減olitical elites.鈥

鈥淭hese are the people who run the party, who hold some sort of office. They鈥檙e the networkers, the ones who encourage certain people to run as party leaders.鈥

O'Neill seeks perceptions of leadership

O鈥橬eill will seek to interview these party elites on their 鈥減erceptions of leadership.鈥 鈥淲hat are the strategic calculations they make when they鈥檙e choosing their leaders?鈥 she asks.

She plans to query party members through questionnaires, to better understand how they perceive the skills, qualities and capabilities associated with party leadership.

By reaching a fuller understanding of these perceptions, O鈥橬eill hopes to evaluate how understandings of leadership might make it harder, or easier, for certain groups to rise to the position of party leader.

O鈥橬eill begins her project at a time of particular interest, as the Conservative Party of Canada is in the middle of a leadership race, with the results to be determined on June 22. This is sure to complicate her work but could also create considerable research opportunities.

鈥淚 have to be strategic in my approach,鈥 O鈥橬eill says. 鈥淎nd I鈥檓 not sure yet which parties will participate. . . It鈥檚 a huge project and it鈥檚 an important one. The work has just begun.鈥